the evidence is irrefutable

days without justice for 9/11

Reality-deniers will dismiss some of these, fine; but to disregard them all...?
Leading Indicators of U.S. Government Complicity in 9/11 + CoverUp:

November 2004: Dems permit Bush to take credit for the worst military failure in U.S. history - which resulted in the deaths of thousands of U.S. civilians - and so Bush Wins!  Is this the worst political stand-down in U.S. history? (more)

We Constitution-huggers here at 911blimp.net want all the awful truths about 9/11 to become fully and widely known, and we welcome all those who feel the same way:  the U.S. government's bogus explanation for what occurred on 9/11 has become The Mother Of All Lies.

This is the inevitable and inescapable conclusion of any and every honest intelligent 9/11 researcher. There are simply too many holes, discrepancies, implausibilities, improbabilities, and impossibilities to not eventually reject the entire official government explanation for 9/11 as The Big Lie.

Where our blimp says "Bush Knew", please do not mistake this as an attempt to be politically divisive. The true masterminds behind 9/11 (definitely not Bush!) are very accomplished at conquering us by dividing We The People with all sorts of titillating emotional diversions and distractions (live televised mass murder, bogus politics, manufactured fear, sexual prisoner torture images, a faked "confession" video, even a phony beheading video).

"Bush Knew" is a catch-phrase for pointing out how bogus the U.S. government's explanation for what it did and did not do really is. We do not consider it an attack on Mr. Bush, just the obvious response to Mr. Bush's own admissions, in which he has repeatedly implicated himself as having somehow been "in the loop" on the very beginning of the supposedly-secret attacks:  Mr. Bush said he watched a plane fly into the 1st WTC tower, on TV, before (9 a.m. when) he entered that Florida classrooom, which is more than 15 hours before the only known video of the first impact was ever broadcast on TV.

The fact that Mr. Bush has never been called upon to account for what was revealed in his 9/11 witness statements - what Bush knew, when he knew it, and how he knew it - is how we know that neither the news media (or is that now more properly known as the news medium?) nor our political system (with its fake-opposition party) nor the U.S. Congress remain functional in any Constitutional sense. Even now, people are still arguing about what "warnings" Bush had, as if he wasn't in on the attacks!

We don't know if then-majority-leader then-Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) really wanted to investigate 9/11 or not; all we do know for sure is that after Bush and Cheney asked Daschle to not investigate 9/11, the U.S. Senate did not investigate 9/11. Neither has the U.S. House of Representatives investigated 9/11. There have been some investigations around the edges - "intelligence failures (sic) leading up to 9/11", etc - but no official forensic analysis of the actual events of 9/11 itself. In fact, large amounts of government resources have been used to ensure that even investigations typical (and required!) of much less consequential catastrophes did not take place after 9/11.

The 9/11 Commission Report is really an Omission report - each major omission corresponds to an incriminating hole in the government's official conspiracy theory of 9/11. And there are many such holes...

Some people still dismiss, and even try to ridicule, such observations, secure in their belief that 1)no conspiracy so huge and dark and evil could remain secret (wrong!) (wrong again!), and 2)Democrats would never let Republicans get away with anything this dark and evil. But it turns out that both presumptions are false:  Consider that treasonously pro-Nazi banker Prescott Bush (old newspaper article) could never have been elected to the U.S. Senate as a Republican in 1952 unless conniving Democrats (and, of course, the 'news' media) had kept his very-dirty, not-so-little secret for him and from us!  In other words, Dems have been providing staged, fake, phony political opposition to - or should we say FOR - Republicans for longer than most of us have been alive.

That phony political opposition not only divides (& conquers) We The People, it diverts our attention from, and provides cover for, the ongoing covert domestic subversion of the Constitution - of which 9/11 and its liberty-diminishing repercussions have been integral - taking place right before our eyes. But Our Constitution is the only thing that protects us and our children from tyranny and even slavery, so to see it lost on our watch is not something to be proud of.

We can no longer be certain what (or who) our [mis]leaders are loyal to. But it certainly appears that they've sold us (and Our Constitution) out over manufactured fear of a grossly over-hyped, if not entirely virtual, enemy.

So now it's fallen (or risen, depending upon one's point of view) to We The People to stop blindly believing that people within both [sic] political parties have remained loyal to the Constitution just because they'd recited an oath of office to do so. (By 2008, nearly everyone has recognized that the USA is rampaging off and spiraling downward in bogus directions. But the [sic] 2 parties still try to get Us to believe that the problem does not stem from electing generation after generation of Republicans and Democrats, and that the solution is to merely elect different ones occasionally...)

Please bookmark this page, and check back from time to time - we'll try to make it worth your while. And make sure you check out the video evidence, most of which we recorded off-the-air on 9/11. More importantly, please share this information, pronto, with your friends and family.   Comments?